<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A comparison of metadata standards for media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://authoritativeopinion.com/blog/2009/11/11/a-comparison-of-metadata-standards-for-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://authoritativeopinion.com/blog/2009/11/11/a-comparison-of-metadata-standards-for-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:07:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://authoritativeopinion.com/blog/2009/11/11/a-comparison-of-metadata-standards-for-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 01:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authoritativeopinion.com/blog/?p=242#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>Thanks -- I&#039;ve been following the MAWG for awhile now. I love their focus on getting to the essential bits of media metadata, but I&#039;m still very uncertain what the fate of their efforts will be or what they could do to avoid becoming yet another niche W3C standard that is only ever half-implemented. Their crosswalks are very nice, though (and reveal the somewhat ridiculous proliferation of media metadata standards)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8212; I&#8217;ve been following the MAWG for awhile now. I love their focus on getting to the essential bits of media metadata, but I&#8217;m still very uncertain what the fate of their efforts will be or what they could do to avoid becoming yet another niche W3C standard that is only ever half-implemented. Their crosswalks are very nice, though (and reveal the somewhat ridiculous proliferation of media metadata standards)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S. Erickson, Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://authoritativeopinion.com/blog/2009/11/11/a-comparison-of-metadata-standards-for-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2418</link>
		<dc:creator>John S. Erickson, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authoritativeopinion.com/blog/?p=242#comment-2418</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;W3C Video in the Web&lt;/a&gt; work, and especially the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;W3C Media Annotations Working Group.&lt;/a&gt; The purpose of the MAWG is to &quot;provide an ontology and API designed to facilitate cross-community data integration of information related to media objects in the Web, such as video, audio and images.&quot; 

Very heavy focus on &quot;crosswalks&quot; (and rightfully so)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/" rel="nofollow">W3C Video in the Web</a> work, and especially the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/" rel="nofollow">W3C Media Annotations Working Group.</a> The purpose of the MAWG is to &#8220;provide an ontology and API designed to facilitate cross-community data integration of information related to media objects in the Web, such as video, audio and images.&#8221; </p>
<p>Very heavy focus on &#8220;crosswalks&#8221; (and rightfully so)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
